@article {FARIA2010,
	title = {Memory as acquaintance with the past: some Lessons from Russell, 1912-1914},
	journal = {Kriterion},
	volume = {51},
	year = {2010},
	note = {n/a},
	pages = {149 - 172},
	abstract = {<p>Russell{\textquoteright}s theory of memory as acquaintance with the past seems to square uneasily with his definition of acquaintance as the converse of the relation of presentation of an object to a subject. We show how the two views can be made to cohere under a suitable construal of {\textquoteright}presentation{\textquoteright}, which has the additional appeal of bringing Russell{\textquoteright}s theory of memory closer to contemporary views on direct reference and object-dependent thinking than is usually acknowledged. The drawback is that memory as acquaintance with the past falls short of fulfilling Russell{\textquoteright}s requirement that knowledge by acquaintance be discriminating knowledge - a shortcoming shared by contemporary externalist accounts of knowledge from memory.</p>
},
	issn = {0100-512X},
	url = {http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext\&pid=S0100-512X2010000100008\&nrm=iso},
	author = {Faria, Paulo}
}
