@article {3082,
	title = {Avalia{\c c}{\~a}o de modelos obtidos por diferentes sistemas de digitaliza{\c c}{\~a}o 3d para produtos personalizados},
	journal = {DAPesquisa},
	volume = {10},
	year = {2015},
	month = {2016},
	pages = {68 - 86},
	abstract = {<p>The purpose is to evaluate models obtained by different 3D scanning systems, and that the geometric variations can generate implications for anthropometric measurements for custom product design. For comparison and analysis, the right leg of a subject was scanned by white light 3D scanner (Artec Eva) and the infrared scanner (Microsoft Kinect). 3D models obtained by the scanners were compared using the Geomagic Qualify software. Also, by CNC machining of visual comparisons were performed analysis, for pressure mapping and thermography. The results were satisfactory both for the use of Kinect scanner and for Artec Eve. However, there was a dimensional difference of about 7 mm between the 3D models, which shows higher accuracy measures the models obtained by Eve Artec scanner. However, does not invalidate the use of Kinect for developing custom product designs. What will determine the most suitable for each type 3D scanner product is the degree of accuracy necessary for the product to perform its function with greater comfort and efficiency. </p>
},
	isbn = {18083129},
	url = {https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Fabio_Teixeira15/publication/290212680_AVALIACAO_DE_MODELOS_OBTIDOS_POR_DIFERENTES_SISTEMAS_DE_DIGITALIZACAO_3D_PARA_PRODUTOS_PERSONALIZADOS/links/56a605cf08ae2c689d39a344.pdf?origin=publication_detail\&ev=pub_int_prw_x},
	author = {Brendler, Clariana Fischer and Fabio Pinto da Silva and Teixeira, F{\'a}bio Gon{\c c}alves}
}
